“The courier brought the parcel” does not say whether you watched the delivery or heard about it. If your usual past tense leaves that open, add an information-source question before translating into Turkish: how did I learn this?

The idea

Translate the speaker’s access to the event, not just the tense label. In these contexts, getirdi presents the delivery as a fact; getirmiş marks it as indirectly learned. Expressions such as “I hear”, “apparently” and “it turns out” can help convey different uses of -miş, but none is its fixed equivalent. A report and an inference from a result can both motivate it. English simple past and present perfect do not decide the Turkish ending for you. The linked comparison explains the choice in more detail; the suffix pages give the forms.

Examples

  • Kurye paketi sabah getirdi.The courier brought the parcel in the morning.Context: you watched the delivery. The English past alone does not tell us that.
  • Kurye paketi sabah getirmiş.I hear the courier brought the parcel in the morning.Context: your older sister told you about the delivery. “I hear” makes the source perspective visible in English.
  • Rüzgâr saksıyı devirmiş.Apparently the wind knocked over the flowerpot.Context: after strong wind, you find the pot lying on its side. You infer what happened from the result.
  • Meğer aynı mesajı iki kez göndermişim.It turns out I sent the same message twice.The screen shows two copies of your message. Meğer highlights your discovery; the sender is still you.
  • Ablam söyledi; tren erken kalkmış.My older sister told me; the train apparently left early.
  • Bu köprü yüz yıl önce yapıldı.This bridge was built a hundred years ago.

Read-aloud uses a synthetic Turkish voice available on your device. Voice quality and availability vary; it does not assess your pronunciation.

Watch out

Do not add “maybe” to every translation with -miş: indirect information need not mean doubt. Nor does -di certify an eyewitness account; it can present an accepted historical fact. First person is possible with -miş when you discover your own earlier action, as in göndermişim.

Try it yourself

  1. Your older sister tells you a café opened here. Preserve the report: Burada yeni bir kafe ___. Choose açıldı or açılmış.

    Show answer or example answer

    açılmış

    açılmış: the news comes from your older sister. This preserves the requested report perspective even if you trust her completely; the source sentence need not contain a word meaning “perhaps”.

  2. You watched the courier put the parcel on the table. Recount your experience: Kurye paketi ___. Choose getirdi or getirmiş.

    Show answer or example answer

    getirdi

    getirdi: here you saw the courier place the parcel on the table and recount that experience. The choice comes from the supplied context, not simply from the English word “brought”.

  3. After strong wind, you find the flowerpot on its side. Express your inference: Rüzgâr saksıyı ___. Choose devirdi or devirmiş.

    Show answer or example answer

    devirmiş

    devirmiş: the fallen pot after the strong wind is your clue. You see the result now, not the earlier falling event, so the sentence presents an inference.

  4. You now notice two copies of your message on screen. Express the discovery: Aynı mesajı iki kez ___. Choose gönderdim or göndermişim.

    Show answer or example answer

    göndermişim

    göndermişim: the two copies on the screen reveal your own earlier action. The final -im identifies you as the sender; first person does not prevent a later discovery.

Use it today

Write one past event in English without naming its source. Translate it twice: once as your own experience and once as news passed on by someone else. Add a source sentence to each version. Then describe a clue that lets you infer a past event, and continue with the linked comparison and suffix lessons.